Legal Opinion
Coleman v. Daines
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 30, 2012PublishedCited by 84 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the affirmative.
In November 2007 and January 2008, petitioner Barbara Coleman applied for Medicaid-funded personal care attendant services with the New York City Human Resources Administration (HRA). Having received no response to her request by May 2008, she submitted an application for “temporary medical assistance” benefits pending the ultimate determination of her Medicaid application. Later that month, HRA advised Coleman that she was eligible for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hearst Corp. v. ClyneNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Watergate II Apartments v. Buffalo Sewer AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Saratoga County Chamber of Commerce, Inc. v. PatakiNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- City of New York v. MaulNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
- Dean v. BlumenthalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- In the Matter of Veronica P. v. Radcliff A.New York Court of Appeals · 2015
- Whitfield v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2024
- Matter of Elizabeth C. (Omar C.)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- The People v. Freddie ThompsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
- Matter of Kirkland v. AnnucciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.