Legal Opinion

Popovich v. Weingarten

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided March 14, 2011No. 2:09 CV 271PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION and ORDER

JAMES T. MOODY, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on the motion of plaintiffs/counterdefendants Nick Popovich and Sage-Popovich, Inc. (collectively “Popovich”), to dismiss defendant/counterclaimant Mark Weingarten’s claims for defamation and interference with prospective business advantage pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (DE # 35.) For the reasons that follow, the motion is denied.

I. BACKGROUND 1

Mark Weingarten is a freelance journalist living and working in California. Weingarten decided to write a story about high-end repossessors, whose…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Anthony Filice v. Jayco Inc, et al.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2025
  2. Gaston v. HazeltineDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2023
  3. Tripwireless, Inc. v. KingDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API