Popovich v. Weingarten
District Court, N.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
JAMES T. MOODY, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the motion of plaintiffs/counterdefendants Nick Popovich and Sage-Popovich, Inc. (collectively “Popovich”), to dismiss defendant/counterclaimant Mark Weingarten’s claims for defamation and interference with prospective business advantage pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (DE # 35.) For the reasons that follow, the motion is denied.
I. BACKGROUND 1
Mark Weingarten is a freelance journalist living and working in California. Weingarten decided to write a story about high-end repossessors, whose…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Anthony Filice v. Jayco Inc, et al.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2025
- Gaston v. HazeltineDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2023
- Tripwireless, Inc. v. KingDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2025