Legal Opinion
Stein v. Pacific Bell Telephone Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 14, 2001No. 00CV2915 SIPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND
ILLSTON, District Judge.
On January 5, 2001, the Court heard argument on defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Having carefully considered the arguments of the parties and the papers submitted, the Court GRANTS defendants’ motion with leave to amend as set forth below.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Albert O. Stein (“Stein”) brings this action on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated to challenge al leged anticompetitive conduct by defendants…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Davis v. SchererSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Vesta Corp. v. Amdocs Management Ltd.District Court, D. Oregon · 2015
- Covad Communications Co. v. Bell Atlantic Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Covad Communications Co. v. BellSouth Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002