Legal Opinion
Covad Communications Co. v. Bell Atlantic Corp.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 3, 2002No. Civ. A. 99-1046(GK)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KESSLER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Covad Communications Company and Dieca Communications, Inc. (collectively “Covad”), bring this antitrust action for damages and injunctive relief against Defendants, Bell Atlantic Corporation and its subsidiaries (collectively, “Bell Atlantic”).
The matter is now before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint. Upon consideration of the Motion, Opposition, Reply, Sur-re-ply, the numerous submissions of supplemental authority submitted by parties, the Motions Hearing held on March 11, 2002, and the entire…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Davis Ex Rel. LaShonda D. v. Monroe County Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Aspen Skiing Co. v. Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Otter Tail Power Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. GriffithSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Doe I v. State of IsraelDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Covad Communications Co. v. Bell Atlantic Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Cavalier Telephone v. Verizon VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- Cavalier Telephone, LLC v. Verizon Virginia, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- Cavalier Telephone, LLC v. Verizon Virginia, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.