Legal Opinion

Doe v. State

Court of Claims of Illinois

Decided June 3, 1991No. 85-CC-1739PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS

Raucci, J.

This cause coining on to be heard on Respondent’s motion to dismiss the Claimant’s response thereto, and the Court being fully advised in the premises finds:

1. Claimant cites five of our prior decisions in which no issue was raised that the Claimants had not sought relief against mental patients who had attacked them or stolen their property. Three of these cases were decided before the enactment of section 25 of the Court of Claims Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1972, ch. 37, par. 439.24— 5). (Maloney v. State (1957), 22 Ill. Ct. Cl. 567; Callbeck v. State (1958),…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Boe v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1984
  2. Callbeck v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1958
  3. Maloney v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1957
  4. Robinson v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1965
  5. Smith v. State of Illinois, Department of Mental HealthCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1974

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Howell v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1993
  2. Lewis v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1995
  3. Welsh v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1994
  4. Blakely v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1993
  5. Hammonds v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API