Legal Opinion

Boe v. State

Court of Claims of Illinois

Decided October 29, 1984No. 79-CC-1187PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPoch, J.

This matter came on for hearing before Commissioner John P. Simpson for oral argument on two motions to dismiss by the Respondent. The first motion to dismiss was based on the failure of the Claimant to exhaust her remedies pursuant to section 25 of the Court of Claims Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1981, ch. 37, par. 439.24— 5) and Rule 6 of the Court of Claims Rules. The second motion to dismiss was based on the Claimant’s failure to file a legally sufficient notice of claim.

With regards to the first basis for dismissal, to wit: the failure to exhaust all remedies, the following paragraphs of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lyons v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1980

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Doe v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1991
  2. Lutz v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1989
  3. Patton v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1988
  4. Asbury v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1998
  5. Davis v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1996

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API