Legal Opinion

Fairfax Portfolio v. Carojoto

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided September 11, 2020No. 118712Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 118,712 FAIRFAX PORTFOLIO LLC, Appellant, v. CAROJOTO LLC, ROSANA PRIVITERA BIONDO, ANTHONY L. PRIVITERA II, and CARL PRIVITERA, Appellees. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Generally, the mortgagor of real property may retain the possession thereof. 2. A holder of a real estate mortgage cannot, even after condition broken, take possession of the mortgaged property, except by post-default consent of all the parties, acquiescence, or court action. 3. The mortgage instrument alone is unable to provide authority for a lender to take possession of real…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Nauheim v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  2. Casco v. Armour Swift-EckrichSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  3. Graham v. Dokter Trucking GroupSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  4. Hoesli v. Triplett, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  5. State v. QuestedSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API