Legal Opinion

Upper Skagit Indian Tribe v. Suquamish Indian Tribe

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 22, 2017No. 15-35540PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HAWKINS, Circuit Judge:

In this treaty fishing rights case, the Upper Skagit Indian Tribe (“the Upper Skagit”) filed a Request for Determination as to the geographic scope of the Suquamish Indian Tribe’s (“the Suquamish”) usual and accustomed fishing grounds and stations (“U&A”) as determined by Judge Boldt in 1975. Specifically, the Upper Skagit sought a determination that the Suquamish’s U&A determinations do not include Chuckanut Bay, Samish Bay, and a portion of Padilla Bay where the Upper Skagit has its own court-approved U&A determinations (“the Contested Waters”). On…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Headwaters Inc., an Oregon Nonprofit Corporation Forest Conservation Council v. U.S. Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1978
  3. United States v. Lummi Indian TribeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Muckleshoot Tribe v. Lummi Indian TribeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  5. United States v. Muckleshoot Indian TribeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Upper Skagit Indian Tribe v. Sauk-Suiattle Indian TribeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  2. Swinomish Indian Tribal Cmty. v. Lummi NationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  3. Metlakatla Indian Community v. Michael J. Dunleavy, et al.District Court, D. Alaska · 2026
  4. Swinomish Indian Tribal Cmty. v. Lummi NationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  5. United States v. State of WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API