Upper Skagit Indian Tribe v. Suquamish Indian Tribe
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAWKINS, Circuit Judge:
In this treaty fishing rights case, the Upper Skagit Indian Tribe (“the Upper Skagit”) filed a Request for Determination as to the geographic scope of the Suquamish Indian Tribe’s (“the Suquamish”) usual and accustomed fishing grounds and stations (“U&A”) as determined by Judge Boldt in 1975. Specifically, the Upper Skagit sought a determination that the Suquamish’s U&A determinations do not include Chuckanut Bay, Samish Bay, and a portion of Padilla Bay where the Upper Skagit has its own court-approved U&A determinations (“the Contested Waters”). On…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Headwaters Inc., an Oregon Nonprofit Corporation Forest Conservation Council v. U.S. Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1978
- United States v. Lummi Indian TribeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Muckleshoot Tribe v. Lummi Indian TribeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Muckleshoot Indian TribeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Upper Skagit Indian Tribe v. Sauk-Suiattle Indian TribeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Swinomish Indian Tribal Cmty. v. Lummi NationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Metlakatla Indian Community v. Michael J. Dunleavy, et al.District Court, D. Alaska · 2026
- Swinomish Indian Tribal Cmty. v. Lummi NationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- United States v. State of WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021