Legal Opinion

Kaiser Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 14, 1944No. Civ. 12700PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NOURSE, P. J.—

The petitioner seeks an annulment of the award of compensation to an employee who was injured during an altercation between an assistant foreman and a fellow employee.

The applicant, Mollie Pruitt, was a negro woman employed as a tank sealer at petitioner’s shipbuilding plant located at Richmond. She worked in a gang composed of two white women, one colored, and four others whose race and color were not identified. All members of the gang were instructed to take orders only from their leaderman. A white man, Pay Jones, was an assistant labor foreman of the plant, who was not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. CardilloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  2. United States Casualty Co. v. HamptonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Smith v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  2. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  3. Van Duzee v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  4. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Ind. Acc. Com.California Court of Appeal · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API