Legal Opinion

Van Duzee v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 18, 1975No. 1 CA-IC 1217PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NELSON, Presiding Judge.

On November 28, 1973, petitioner Arnold Van Duzee (Van Duzee) was employed as a sprinkler apprentice by respondent, National Turf & Lawn Sprinkler Company, fitting and placing pipe for automatic lawn sprinkling systems. On that date, as Van Duzee was performing his assigned duties, a pickup truck passed his job site. As it did, a co-employee of Van Duzee, Phillip Rohe, made an obscene gesture at the passengers of the truck. The truck proceeded down the road a short distance, then returned to the job site. The occupants of the truck exited and words were then…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Cammeron v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Sproul v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Claim of Seymour v. Rivera Appliances Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Cammeron v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cavco Industries v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZ.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Epperson v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  3. Cavco Industries v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZ.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Flamingo Motor Inn v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZ.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  5. Flamingo Motor Inn v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZ.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API