Legal Opinion

Strand v. US NATL. BANK NATL. ASS'N ND

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 2005No. 20040068PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Invoking N.D.R.App.P. 47, the United States District Court for the Central District of California has certified the following questions to this Court:

1) Is a “no class action” provision in an arbitration agreement unconscionable under North Dakota contract law?

2) If yes, is the remainder of the arbitration agreement enforceable?

We conclude that, under the facts presented in the order certifying the questions, the no class action provision in the arbitration agreement is not unconscionable under North Dakota law.

I

[¶ 2] Dennis Strand, a resident of Oregon, was issued a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Gillman v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Terry Johnson v. West Suburban Bank Tele-Cash Inc. County Bank of Rehoboth Beach, Delaware Tele-Cash Inc. County Bank of Rehoboth Beach, DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  3. Maxwell v. Fidelity Financial Services, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Roussalis v. Wyoming Medical Center, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Continental Casualty Co. v. KinseyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Discover Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Kinkel v. Cingular Wireless, LLCIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Bagley v. Mt. Bachelor, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Eberle v. EberleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Discover Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API