Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Mallard Coach Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 9, 1992PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Mahoney, J.

This action for, inter alia, breach of warranty is the culmination of a one-year ordeal by plaintiffs to have certain plumbing defects in their new motor home remedied. In February 1986, plaintiffs purchased a motor home from defendant R. V. America (hereinafter the retailer). The motor home was manufactured by defendant Mallard Coach Company (hereinafter the manufacturer) and came with a limited, one-year warranty from the manufacturer warranting "to the original consumer purchaser * * * that [the motor home] shall be free of substantial defects in materials…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Segal Enterprises, Inc.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1986
  2. Gem Jewelers, Inc. v. DykmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Marine Midland Bank, N. A. v. CarrollAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Sorce v. Naperville Jeep Eagle, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  2. Mesa v. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  3. Polaris Industries, Inc. v. McDonald, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2003
  4. Price v. Chevrolet Motor Division of General Motors Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Rite Aid Corp. v. Levy-GrayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API