State v. Clark

Defendant was convicted of the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor on March IS, 1922. Defendant operated a soft drink estab*118lishment at the Minnesota House in Rochester and it was there the liquor is alleged to have been sold. Two witnesses testified tb the sale. Defendant denied it and produced witnesses to prove an alibi. Whether or not defendant sold the liquor was a pure question of fact. The evidence sustains the verdict.

Evidence was received of other sales of liquor by defendant and of liquor found in the Minnesota House on several occasions, one as late as July 8, 1922. Defendant…