Legal Opinion

Hay v. Scott

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 3, 1982No. 82-52PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John I. Purtle, Justice.

A trial court jury found against the appellants’ claim that an overloaded extension cord caused a fire which damaged a business known as The Wishing Well and spread to businesses known as The Gift Box, B G’s Fashions, Inc., The Frame House and Mike R. Lawyer. Apparently, other businesses located in the East Plaza Shopping Center, in the vicinity of the Wishing Well, filed suits against the appellees. All suits were consolidated for trial.

On appeal it is argued: (1) the trial court erred in failing to strike the testimony of Joe Scott as to the electrical origin of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McGeorge Contracting Co. v. MizellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  2. Higdon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
  3. Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dildine v. Clark Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  2. Ryker v. FisherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  3. Bull v. BrantnerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API