Bull v. Brantner

Tom Glaze, Judge.

This appeal arises from a jury verdict of $10,000 in appellees’ action for breach of an implied warranty of fitness and habitability on appellees’ home. The appellant builder raises three issues.

Appellant first contends appellees did not give adequate notice of all of the claimed defects. We considered this same issue in Pickler v. Fisher, 7 Ark. App. 125, 644 S.W.2d 644 (1983), and we find that case dispositive here. The Picklers constructed a home which they sold to the Fishers. The Fishers first complained orally to the Picklers about alleged defects in the home; they next…