Legal Opinion

Dildine v. Clark Equipment Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 26, 1984No. 83-278PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Steele Hays, Justice.

This is a product liability case against a manufacturer and its distributor. The questions on appeal are whether the trial court was correct in excluding testimony of an expert witness for the plaintiff on the issue of liability, and in granting defense motions for a directed verdict. We think the court erred in part in these rulings.

Thomas Dildine, the appellant, began working for Tenco, Inc., a feed and grain supplier, in January, 1982. The work included operating a front-end loader known as a “632 Bobcat”, which Dildine used to load cattle feed into a mixing bin. The…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Chapman Chemical Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  2. Ratton v. BusbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
  3. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. LittleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  4. Firemen's Insurance Co. v. LittleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  5. Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. MorrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Seasword v. Hilti, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Thomas v. SessionsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  3. Bowden v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  4. Higgins v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  5. Dumond v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API