Legal Opinion

Pettry v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 19, 2011No. ED 95664PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KURT S. ODENWALD, Presiding Judge.

Introduction

Michael Pettry (Pettry) appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.085 1 motion without an evidentiary hearing. Pettry claims the motion court erred when it denied his post-conviction claims that his plea counsel was ineffective for promising him if he pleaded guilty to one count of driving while intoxicated, chronic offender, he would be sentenced to an alcohol treatment program and 120 days of shock incarceration. Additionally, Pettry claims his plea counsel led him to believe he would be required to serve only 15% or 20% of his…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Day v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  2. Worthington v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
  3. McCracken v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LPSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  4. Gehrke v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  5. Gerlt v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Casey Langhans v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Redmond v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Amber R. Miller v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. JOHNATHAN J. YOUNG, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. Jakib Propst v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API