Harvey v. State
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Batjer, J.:
A jury found appellants Harvey and Henandez guilty of robbery. In this appeal it is contended that joint representation by appointed counsel resulted in a conflict of interest and a denial of effective assistance of counsel. We reverse.
On the night of December 4, 1978, appellants entered the East Fork Bar in Gardnerville, Nevada, where Mrs. Marie Corda was working as bartender. Appellants had apparently been drinking alcoholic beverages earlier in the evening, and continued to drink at the bar. While playing the juke box and listening to music, Harvey asked Mrs.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Anna Erna LawriwCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- State v. OlsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Kabase v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1980
3Cited by14 opinions
- Clark v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1992
- Shongutsie v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
- Hayes v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1990
- Ryan v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 2007
- Cosgrove v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.