Legal Opinion

Daniel v. Adorno Ex Rel. Adorno

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 1954No. 1532PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Associate Judge.

An automobile owned by Henry Daniel, Sr., and operated by his son, Henry Daniel, Jr., was in collision with an automobile operated by Joseph M. Adorno, a minor. Daniel Sr., carried liability insurance with the Travelers Indemnity Company. After investigation Travelers determined that a compromise of Adorno’s claim for personal injuries was advisable for all concerned and agreed to pay $2,500 in settlement; The settlement was effected in the following manner. ' Joseph M. Adorno, through his father as next friend, filed suit against both Daniel Sr. and Daniel Jr. for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Isaacson v. BoswellNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  2. De Carlucci v. BrasleyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  3. Perry v. FaulknerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1954

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Faught Ex Rel. Faught v. WashamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  2. Bratton v. SpeaksCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1956
  3. Beauchamp v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  4. Eaton v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  5. Gamble v. StuttsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API