Legal Opinion

Perry v. Faulkner

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 18, 1954No. 4273PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlandin, J.

The single issue before us is whether in the circumstances here counsel for the insurance company defending in behalf of Mrs. Perry had authority to settle the suit so as to bar the cross action against Faulkner in which she was plaintiff. Hubley v. Goodwin, 91 N. H. 200. In its policy the insurance company agreed to “ (a) defend any suit against the insured alleging such injury, sickness, disease or destruction and seeking damages on account thereof . . . but the company may make such investiga-r tion, negotiation and settlement of any claim or suit as it deems expedient.” (Emphasis…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Haluka v. BakerOhio Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. Fillhardt v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Faught Ex Rel. Faught v. WashamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  2. Beauchamp v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. Brown v. ManchesterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  4. Daniel v. Adorno Ex Rel. AdornoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954
  5. Wieding v. KrischCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API