Legal Opinion
De Carlucci v. Brasley
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided September 15, 1951PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
16 N.J. Super. 48 (1951)
83 A.2d 823
ANTHONY DE CARLUCCI, PLAINTIFF,
v.
HYMAN BRASLEY AND ERNEST HAYEN, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided September 15, 1951.
Mr. Louis J. Anzalone, attorney for plaintiff.
Messrs. Markley & Broadhurst, attorneys for defendant counterclaimant.
TENENBAUM, J.C.C. (temporarily assigned).
The plaintiff, Anthony De Carlucci, instituted suit sounding in tort, the gravamen of which complaint charges each defendant, Hyman Brasley and Ernest Hayen, with negligence, individually and jointly, in the operation of their respective motor vehicles, as a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kelleher v. LozziSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- McDonald v. Royal Indemnity InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1932
3Cited by11 opinions
- Faught Ex Rel. Faught v. WashamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- Reardon v. AllenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
- Isaacson v. BoswellNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- Daniel v. Adorno Ex Rel. AdornoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954
- Wieding v. KrischCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.