Legal Opinion
In Re Letters Rogatory From Supreme Ct. of Ontario
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided June 16, 1987No. Misc. 87-0658PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION
COHN, District Judge.
This is a matter relating to letters rogatory on behalf of a Canadian proceeding. The Court’s jurisdiction is grounded on 28 U.S.C. § 1782. 1 For the reasons that follow, I am recusing myself, and the subpoena in the proceeding will be supervised by another judge from this district.
I
A
On May 21, 1987, the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Michigan applied to me 2 for an order under section 1782 appointing the Honorable Justice Campbell Grant 3 as Commissioner for the purpose of taking the testimony and documents of John E. Amerman and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Bernice ROBERTS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Benjamin F. BAILAR, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- John Deere Limited and Deere & Company v. Sperry CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- In Re Letters Rogatory From the Tokyo District, Tokyo, JapanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- State of Idaho v. FreemanDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Philip Morris USA Inc. v. United States Food and Drug AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Hoffenberg v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- In Re NortonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1990
- Sharp v. Howard CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Application of Asta Medica, SADistrict Court, D. Maine · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.