Legal Opinion
Hoffenberg v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 27, 2004No. 00 CIV. 1686(RWS)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Petitioner Steven Jude Hoffenberg (“Hoffenberg” or “Petitioner”) has moved this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 144 and 455 for an order recusing the undersigned from hearing Hoffenberg’s motion to vacate his conviction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The United States as Respondent (the “Government”) has opposed the motion, which is denied for the reasons set forth below.
Prior Proceedings
As the asserted grounds for Hoffen-berg’s motion for recusal evoke the underlying facts and the legal determinations reached in numerous federal actions in which Hoffenberg has been…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- United States v. YousefCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- In Re International Business MacHines Corporation, United States of America v. International Business MacHines CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Da Silva Moore v. Publicis Groupe & MSL GroupDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Kolon Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2012
- Philip Morris USA Inc. v. United States Food and Drug AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Kolon Industries, Inc. v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2012
- Sharkey v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.