Legal Opinion

In Re Ajuria

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 13, 1922No. Crim. No. 636PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.

The petitioners were convicted of the violation of an ordinance of the city of Marysville and sentenced to pay fines and to be imprisoned in the county jail. They herein seek their discharge upon a writ of habeas corpus.

The petition does not set out the terms of the ordinance or state the offense of which the petitioners were convicted other than that it was a misdemeanor. It may be inferred from the facts alleged, however, that they were found guilty of having wine in their possession contrary to the terms of the ordinance.

It is alleged that the police officers unlawfully and without a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. MayenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Jenkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  3. People v. JamesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  4. People v. PrattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. People v. Park, New York County Courts1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Silverstein v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
  2. Wilson v. LoustalotCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API