Legal Opinion
Boster v. C & M Service, Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 24, 1994No. 93AP-653PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Strausbaugh, Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant, Bruce Boster, appeals the judgment of the Franklin County Municipal Court overruling plaintiffs Civ.R. 60(B) motion. Plaintiff sets forth the following two assignments or error:
“1. The trial court committed prejudicial error and abused its discretion when it failed to sustain appellant’s motion for Rule 60(B) relief.
“2. The trial court committed prejudicial error and abused its discretion when it failed to hold a hering [sic ] prior to ruling on appellant’s Rule 60(B) motion.”
The record indicates that on November 12,1991, plaintiff filed an action…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Adomeit v. BaltimoreOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
- Bolen v. YoungOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
3Cited by17 opinions
- GMAC Mortgage, L.L.C. v. HerringOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- Your Financial Community of Ohio, Inc. v. EmerickOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
- CitiMortgage, Inc. v. DudekOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Cuervo v. SnellOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
- Estate of Orecny v. Ford Motor Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.