Legal Opinion

Cuervo v. Snell

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 1, 1998No. 98AP-110PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Petree, Judge.

Defendant, Stephen H. Snell, appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas denying his Civ.R. 60(B)(5) motion for relief from judgment and advances the following three assignments of error:

“[I]. The trial court erred to the prejudice of defendant in denying the motion for relief from judgment on the grounds that Civil Rule 60(B)(5) was inapplicable; rather, relief under Rule 60(B)(5) is available to avoid injustice and inequity relating to either the obtaining or ‘maintaining’ of a default judgment.
“[II]. The trial court erred as a matter of law in denying…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Huffman v. Hair Surgeon, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Griffey v. RajanOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Kay v. Marc Glassman, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Caruso-Ciresi, Inc. v. LohmanOhio Supreme Court · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. Ohio Dept. of Transp., 08ap-330 (12-30-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Boling v. Dimeche Vlado, Inc., 07ap-146 (10-30-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. State v. Hatton, 06ca35 (7-19-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Swan v. Swan, Unpublished Decision (9-6-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Warsame v. Trans Am Trucking, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API