Legal Opinion

Russell P. Miller and Margaret Jane Miller, His Wife v. American Telephone & Telegraph Company (Hereafter At&t)

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided November 4, 1974No. 73-2007PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEITZ, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs, stockholders in American Telephone and Telegraph Company (“AT&T”), brought a stockholders’ derivative action in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania against AT&T and all but one of its directors. The suit centered upon the failure of AT&T to collect an outstanding debt of some $1.5 million owed to the company by the Democratic National Committee (“DNC”) for communications services provided by AT&T during the 1968 Democratic national convention. Federal diversity jurisdiction was invoked under 28 U.S.C. § 1332.

Plaintiffs’ complaint alleged that “neither the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United States v. International Union United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. United Copper Securities Co. v. Amalgamated Copper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Jane Perlman v. C. Russell Feldmann, Newport Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  5. United States v. Congress of Industrial OrganizationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. In Re Caremark International Inc. Derivative LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1996
  3. In Re Walt Disney Co. Derivative LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2005
  4. Lewis v. CurtisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  5. United States v. Armand P. D'AmAtoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API