Russell P. Miller and Margaret Jane Miller, His Wife v. American Telephone & Telegraph Company (Hereafter At&t)
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SEITZ, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs, stockholders in American Telephone and Telegraph Company (“AT&T”), brought a stockholders’ derivative action in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania against AT&T and all but one of its directors. The suit centered upon the failure of AT&T to collect an outstanding debt of some $1.5 million owed to the company by the Democratic National Committee (“DNC”) for communications services provided by AT&T during the 1968 Democratic national convention. Federal diversity jurisdiction was invoked under 28 U.S.C. § 1332.
Plaintiffs’ complaint alleged that “neither the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. International Union United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United Copper Securities Co. v. Amalgamated Copper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Jane Perlman v. C. Russell Feldmann, Newport Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- United States v. Congress of Industrial OrganizationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- In Re Caremark International Inc. Derivative LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1996
- In Re Walt Disney Co. Derivative LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2005
- Lewis v. CurtisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Armand P. D'AmAtoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.