Legal Opinion · Dissent

Springer v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 15, 1975No. 1 CA-IC 1058, 1 CA-IC 1114Published

1DissentNelson, Presiding Judge

I must dissent from the conclusion reached by the majority.

The precise question presented by these petitions was previously before the Court of Appeals in The Industrial Commission of Arizona v. Jordan, 9 Ariz.App. 23, 448 P.2d 895 (1968), and there the court ruled that tips should not be included in wages for purposes of computation of average monthly wages. It was upon the Jordan case that the hearing officer based the awards excluding tips from the wage calculations for the present petitioners. I would overrule Jordan.

To decide which of the two positions this Court ought to adopt,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Unemployment Compensation Com. v. . Ins. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  2. Unemployment Compensation Commission v. Jefferson Standard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  3. Maness v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Whyte v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Goldman v. KautzArizona Supreme Court · 1975

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API