Jenning v. Rohde
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Redwood county to recover alleged loans of $200 and $1,235. The case was tried before Webber, and a jury, which returned a verdict in favor of defendants. From an order denying a motion to vacate and set aside the verdict and to grant a new trial, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
Respondents are husband and wife, and Ida Rohde is the daughter of appellant. The action was commenced to recover the sums of $200 and $1,235, respectively, alleged to have been loaned to respondents by appellant. The answer is a general denial. At the trial respondents admitted having received the money, but contended it was a gift. A verdict was returned for respondents.
1. Appellant, having been called as a witness in his own behalf, was asked the following question on cross-examination by respondents’ counsel:
Q. Didn’t you say, after you had been to the farm and were going back — Didn’t…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Towson v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Bauer v. BauerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1896
- Hanson v. Diamond Iron Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Yeakel v. McAteeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Loftus-Hubbard Elevator Co. v. Smith-Alvord Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Bankers Trust Co. v. Bank of Rockville Center Trust Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
- Mercil v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1955
- State v. One Oldsmobile Two-Door SedanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Payne v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916
- Mallett v. HallSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1930
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.