Legal Opinion

Baradaran Ghasaban, Sr v. Blinken

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 2, 2025No. Civil Action No. 2024-2946Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMIR HOSSEIN BARADARAN GHASABAN, et al., Plaintiffs, No. 24-cv-2946 (DLF) v. MARCO A. RUBIO, et al., Defendants. 1 MEMORANDUM OPINION The plaintiffs bring this action under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA),

5 U.S.C. §§ 706(1), (2)(A), and the Mandamus Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1361, to compel a final decision on Amir Hossein Baradaran Ghasaban’s (Baradaran’s) nonimmigrant visa application. Before the Court is the defendants’ motion to dismiss. See Mot. to Dismiss, Dkt. 15. For the reasons that follow, the Court will grant the motion. I.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API