Legal Opinion

Belli v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1974No. L.A. 30120PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

We review here a recommendation by the State Bar’s Disciplinary Board that petitioner Melvin Belli be suspended from the practice of law in the State of California for one year. Mr. Belli stands accused of wilful violations of rule 2, section a, of the Rules of Professional Conduct, which declares, in part, that “[a] member of the State Bar shall not solicit professional employment by advertisement or otherwise.”1 The board deter*828mined that Belli violated this proscription primarily through the acts of an agent, one Richard Fulton.

Petitioner Belli gained, entrance to the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Murdock v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Smith v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Martin v. City of StruthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. MosesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Jacoby v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Sampson v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Benson v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. In RE DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST McCRAYNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API