Legal Opinion
State v. Elstad
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided February 16, 1983No. 29500; CA A24659PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*675WARDEN, J.
Defendant appeals his conviction for burglary in the first degree. He assigns as error the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress a written confession, claiming that a prior, unconstitutionally obtained confession “let the cat out of the bag,” United States v. Bayer, 331 US 532, 540, 67 S Ct 1394, 91 L Ed 1654 (1947), and tainted the subsequent confession, under the “fruit of the poisonous tree” doctrine of Wong Sun v. United States, 371 US 471, 83 S Ct 407, 9 L Ed 2d 441 (1963). We reverse.
On December 17, 1981, officers McAllister and Burke went to defendant’s home with a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. BayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Clewis v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. HartleySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
- United States v. Allen WaunekaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- State v. ArmstrongWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. O'NEILLSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.