Legal Opinion
United States v. Allen Wauneka
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 10, 1985No. 84-1236PublishedCited by 94 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUG, Circuit Judge:
Appellee Allen Wauneka (“Wauneka”) was charged with several counts of assault and rape stemming from two separate assaults on female nurses in Fort Defiance, Arizona. Wauneka moved to suppress all statements made by him to law enforcement officials on January 20 and 22, 1984, on the grounds that his initial confession was the product of questioning by the police not preceded by the warnings required in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), and that the subsequent statements were not sufficiently attenuated from the earlier confession and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by94 opinions
- United States v. Tashiri Wayne WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Victor Montano DislaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Arturo Gonzalez-SandovalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- State v. HartleySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
- 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6094, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9962 United States of America v. Miguel PolancoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.