Legal Opinion
Blaylock v. Akin
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided May 29, 1981No. 8877PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CORNELIUS, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from a summary judgment. Blaylock sued Akin for damages for breach of an alleged agreement to settle a judgment debt. Upon Akin’s motion the district court granted summary judgment that Blaylock take nothing and that Akin recover his costs. Blaylock appeals.
The summary judgment proof consisted only of the depositions of both Blaylock and Akin. From them certain undisputed facts are shown: On May 3, 1971, Akin obtained a judgment against Blaylock in the sum of $2,059.48, together with $26.00 cost of court and interest from date at 6% per annum. In…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Pugh v. TurnerTexas Supreme Court · 1946
- Stone v. MorrisonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
- Rotan Grocery Co. v. NobleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
- Pickering v. First Greenville National BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Silvers Box Corp. v. Boynton Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1927
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- McCallum Highlands, Ltd. v. Washington Capital Dus, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Fortner v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1984
- Jeanes v. Hamby, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1984
- First Equipment Leasing Corp. v. Luce (In Re Luce)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1989
- David Ahr, Leigh Anne Ahr, and Rock Lake Partners v. Sharon Elaine Palasota, Independent of the Estate of Ricky J. Palasota, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2026
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.