Legal Opinion

Goldsmith v. Reliance Insurance

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 30, 1967PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.

This is an action in which the plaintiffs seek to recover on eight policies of fire insurance issued by the defendants. The case was referred to an auditor whose findings of fact were to be final.

The auditor found the following facts. The plaintiffs', Irving L. Goldsmith and Philip R. Corbert, copartners doing business under the name of The Mill Outlet, conducted a retail clothing store in Holyoke. On April 7,1961, a fire occurred at the store. At that time the stock, fixtures and improvements were insured in the amount of $46,000 under eight policies of insurance issued by the seven…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brooks v. Fitchburg & Leominster Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  2. City of Everett v. City of RevereMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  3. Barton v. Automobile InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Alcoa v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Aluminum Co. of America v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Schwartz v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
  4. Walsh v. OgorzalekMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  5. Rita v. CarellaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API