Legal Opinion

Barton v. Automobile Insurance

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 27, 1941PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.

This is an action of contract begun in a District Court on October 22, 1935, upon a “fine arts” policy of insurance dated July 16, 1930, and actually issued to the plaintiff on July 24, 1930, by the Inland Marine Department of the defendant, insuring sixty-one oil paintings listed in an accompanying schedule and therein separately valued, the sum of the separate valuations being $184,250, against all risks of loss or damage except those specifically excluded. See G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 175, § 3; § 47, Second, (d); § 22A as amended by St. 1935, c. 234, and St. 1938, c. 181. Loss or damage by fire…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Campbell v. WhoriskeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  2. Snow v. AlleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  3. Reed v. Washington Fire & Marine InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  4. Wainer v. Milford Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  5. Hood v. HartshornMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Alcoa v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Aluminum Co. of America v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Goldsmith v. Reliance InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  4. F.C.I. Realty Trust v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995
  5. NCS Management Corp. v. Sterling Collision Centers, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API