Legal Opinion
People v. Eckstrom
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 25, 1986No. A030621PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MERRILL, J.
Appellant Kevin Eckstrom and codefendant Jack Parke Daily, Jr., were charged by information with a felony violation of Health and Safety Code 1 section 11358, marijuana cultivation, and a felony violation of section 11359, possession of marijuana for the purpose of sale. Appellant moved to set aside the information (Pen. Code, § 995) and to suppress evidence (Pen. Code, § 1538.5), both of which motions were denied. Thereafter, Eckstrom entered a plea of not guilty, and following a jury trial was found guilty of possession of marijuana for sale.
Eckstrom was sentenced to two…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- California v. CiraoloSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- People v. IbarraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- People v. BradleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. MezaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- People v. TrippCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- People v. GrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- People v. RomeroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Roscoe Littlefield v. County of HumboldtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.