Gilbert v. Burnstine
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTownley, J.
Plaintiff moves for judgment on the pleadings under rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice, and defendants by counter motion move for judgment on the pleadings in their favor and to strike out as sham part of plaintiff’s reply. The pleadings before the court are the amended complaint, answer and reply served by direction of the court. Plaintiff instituted an arbitration proceeding in London, England, in which the defendants failed to appear pursuant to process and notices served in New York. The arbitration proceeded in their absence and resulted in a money award in favor of plaintiff.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Union Insurance Co. of Philadelphia v. NashNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Aktiebolaget v. WeissAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- In re Inter-Ocean Food Products, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re Application to Obtain Discovery for Use in Foreign ProceedingsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Delaware & Hudson R. Corporation v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
- Hespe v. Corning Glass Works, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1935
- Brandt v. CohnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- Besler v. Eldorado Cleaners, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.