Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania Power & Light Co. v. City of Bethlehem

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 25, 1936No. Appeals, 247 and 28PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The City of Bethlehem proposed to increase its debt by councilmanic authorization of a bond issue. Proceedings were instituted to enjoin this on the ground that it would exceed the two per cent, limit on council-manic borrowing established by article IX, section 8, of the Constitution. The court below held that the present debt, without including the proposed increase, transgressed the constitutional limitation by $123,645.07. Both parties appeal.

The city complains that the court below erred in including as part of its bonded indebtedness the four-mill tax imposed by the Act of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Georges Township v. Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Schuldice v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  3. Scranton Electric Co. v. Old Forge Boro.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Campbell v. Wilkins TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  5. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co. v. Coal Township Directors of the PoorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. CHARTIER REAL ESTATE COMPANY v. ChafeeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1967
  2. Bd. of Educ. of County of Hancock v. SlackWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Metropolitan Water District v. HeilbronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. American La France Fire Engine Co. ex rel. American La France & Foamite Industries, Inc. v. Borough of ShenandoahDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co. v. Mt. Carmel Township School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API