Pennsylvania Power & Light Co. v. City of Bethlehem
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The City of Bethlehem proposed to increase its debt by councilmanic authorization of a bond issue. Proceedings were instituted to enjoin this on the ground that it would exceed the two per cent, limit on council-manic borrowing established by article IX, section 8, of the Constitution. The court below held that the present debt, without including the proposed increase, transgressed the constitutional limitation by $123,645.07. Both parties appeal.
The city complains that the court below erred in including as part of its bonded indebtedness the four-mill tax imposed by the Act of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Georges Township v. Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Schuldice v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- Scranton Electric Co. v. Old Forge Boro.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Campbell v. Wilkins TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co. v. Coal Township Directors of the PoorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- CHARTIER REAL ESTATE COMPANY v. ChafeeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1967
- Bd. of Educ. of County of Hancock v. SlackWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
- Metropolitan Water District v. HeilbronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- American La France Fire Engine Co. ex rel. American La France & Foamite Industries, Inc. v. Borough of ShenandoahDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
- Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co. v. Mt. Carmel Township School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.