Legal Opinion

Monaco v. Pepperidge Farms, Inc.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 25, 1967PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

94 N.J. Super. 39 (1967)

226 A.2d 741

PATRICK J. MONACO, PLAINTIFF,

v.

PEPPERIDGE FARMS, INCORPORATED, A CONNECTICUT CORPORATION, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided January 25, 1967.

Messrs. Conrad & Jones, attorneys for the plaintiff (Mr. David W. Conrad appearing).

Messrs. Meyner and Wiley, attorneys for defendant (Mr. Dominick R. Vetri, appearing).

HERBERT, J.S.C.

This is a motion for an order requiring defendant to produce books and records and to permit them to be inspected and copied. Plaintiff's designation of what he wants access to is: "books and records which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tessmar v. GrosnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  2. George v. George F. Berkander, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1961
  3. Barr and Sons, Inc. v. Cherry Hill Center, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
  4. Gillette Company v. Two Guys From Harrison, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1962

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sandler v. Lawn-A-Mat Chem. & Equip. Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  2. North American Pump Corp. v. Clay Equipment Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Martin v. Educational Testing Service, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
  4. Donovan v. BachstadtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
  5. Gureghian v. Hackensack Hosp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API