Legal Opinion
Barr and Sons, Inc. v. Cherry Hill Center, Inc.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 28, 1966PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
90 N.J. Super. 358 (1966)
217 A.2d 631
BARR AND SONS, INC. OF CHERRY HILL, NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF, CROSS-APPELLANT, RESPONDENT,
v.
CHERRY HILL CENTER, INC., AND BAILEY, BANKS AND BIDDLE OF CHERRY HILLS, INC., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS AND CROSS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued November 8, 1965.
Decided February 28, 1966.
Before Judges CONFORD, KILKENNY and LEONARD.
Mr. Samuel Kalikman argued the cause for defendants-appellants.
Mr. Albert B. Melnik argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (Messrs. Melnik, Tarter and Muller, attorneys).
The opinion of the court was…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Leman v. Krentler-Arnold Hinge Last Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Casriel v. KingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- Taylor v. KaufholdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- 525 Main Street Corp. v. Eagle Roofing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Washington Construction Co., Inc. v. SpinellaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Walgreen Company v. Sara Creek Property Company, B v. A/K/A Sara Creek Beta, and Phar-Mor CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Coleco Industries, Inc. v. BermanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Moorestown Mgmt. v. MOORESTOWN BOOKSHOPNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
- JL Davis & Associates v. HeidlerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
- Stuchin v. KasirerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.