Carstensen Contracting, Inc. v. Mid-Dakota Rural Water System, Inc.
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KONENKAMP, Justice.
[¶ 1.] In this construction contract dispute, we must decide whether a requirement in the contract that the general contractor pay “all claims growing out of the lawful demand of’ subcontractors, laborers, mechanics, materialmen, furnishers and suppliers means claims only on which a mechanic’s lien has been filed. In granting summary judgment, the circuit court held that the general contractor had no duty to pay the unpaid bills from a bankrupt subcontractor’s suppliers, since the suppliers filed no mechanic’s liens to secure their claims. Because the filing of a mechanic’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Malcolm v. MalcolmSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- American State Bank v. AdkinsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Brooks v. HayesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
- Trouten v. Heritage Mutual Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Economic Aero Club, Inc. v. Avemco Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hofeldt v. MehlingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Parks v. CooperSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Fenske Media Corp. v. Banta Corp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Lien v. LienSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Prunty Construction, Inc. v. City of CanistotaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.