United States v. Mitchell
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SHEPHERD, Circuit Judge.
In August 2005, Daniel P. Mitchell was convicted of knowingly and fraudulently making a false statement under penalty of perjury in relation to a bankruptcy case, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 152(3). The district court 1 ordered a new trial because the jury did not unanimously find that the false statements were material. The district court denied Mitchell’s motion to dismiss the indictment on double jeopardy grounds, and we affirmed that decision. United States v. Mitchell, 476 F.3d 539 (8th Cir.2007).
At a second trial, a jury again found Mitchell guilty of violating…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. Thomas Chisolm BartshCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Rashad McKayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Merlyn A. YAGOW, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Susan Doris Phillips, A/K/A Cheryl Olson, A/K/A Susan Doris HerbstCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mitchell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Mohammed v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Russell MarksCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. ValentineDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2008