Legal Opinion

Mohammed v. Holder

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 19, 2009No. 07-73940, 08-71182Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Petitioner Ibrahim Ibssa Mohammed, a citizen of Ethiopia, brings these consolidat ed petitions for review of two orders of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). In the first order, the BIA adopted and affirmed the decision of the Immigration Judge (“IJ”) concluding that Mohammed’s conviction for “robbery” under Arizona Revised Statutes § 13-1902 constituted a “particularly serious crime,” making Mohammed ineligible for asylum and withholding of removal, and that Mohammed failed to meet his burden for protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Petitioner’s first…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Khadija Mohammed v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General, Khadija Ahmed Mohamed v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. Mauro Antonio Cano-Merida v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. Satnam Singh-Kaur, AKA Hari Singh v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  4. Ranjit Singh v. Immigration and Naturalization ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. Marjorie Konda Lolong v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API