Legal Opinion

Bartynski v. City of Highland Park, Michigan

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided February 8, 2022No. 2:21-cv-10049Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION KEATH BARTYNSKI, Plaintiff, Case No. 21-10049 v. HON. MARK A. GOLDSMITH CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK, MICHIGAN, Defendant. __________________________________/ OPINION & ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS (Dkt. 11) This matter is before the Court on Defendant City of Highland Park’s motion to dismiss brought pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (Dkt. 11). For the reasons stated below, the Court denies the motion.1 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Keath Bartynski brings this

42 U.S.C. § 1983

action against…

2Cases cited19 opinions

Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
Garcetti v. CeballosSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.