Legal Opinion
State v. Martin
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided March 28, 2008No. 96,126PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Johnson, J.:
In his prosecution for possession of marijuana, Paul B. Martin unsuccessfully moved to suppress the evidence retrieved from his pocket. On appeal, the Court of Appeals reversed the district court and found that the evidence should have been suppressed. State v. Martin, No. 96,126, unpublished opinion filed February 16, 2007.
The State of Kansas seeks review, claiming that the Court of Appeals erred in failing to consider how the discovery of Martin's outstanding arrest warrant should affect the lawfulness of the search and that the Court of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United States v. Manuel Melendez-GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- State v. EliasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
- State of Texas v. Mazuca, AlvaroCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
- State v. TalkingtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
- People v. BrendlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. MoralezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.