Hale v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1DissentNix, Judge
If, in the beginning, the appellate courts had adhered strictly to the law of search and seizure, the law now would be so clari*1101fied that a path would have been hewn and could be followed with the greatest Of ease. However, the tendency to justify violations of the search and seizure law has permitted the exception to seriously foreshadow the general rule. The constitutional provision establishing the protection against unlawful search and seizure was embedded in the Constitution of our state in clear, simple and concise language, such language as could be easily read and understood by the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ex parte FinnOregon Supreme Court · 1898
- Crossland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1954
- Linthicum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1939
- Farrow v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
- Griffin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.