Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hale v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided October 1, 1958No. A-12607Published

1DissentNix, Judge

If, in the beginning, the appellate courts had adhered strictly to the law of search and seizure, the law now would be so clari*1101fied that a path would have been hewn and could be followed with the greatest Of ease. However, the tendency to justify violations of the search and seizure law has permitted the exception to seriously foreshadow the general rule. The constitutional provision establishing the protection against unlawful search and seizure was embedded in the Constitution of our state in clear, simple and concise language, such language as could be easily read and understood by the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ex parte FinnOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Crossland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1954
  3. Linthicum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1939
  4. Farrow v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
  5. Griffin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API