Legal Opinion
Sonino v. Magrini
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 5, 1929PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Malley, J.
By the allegations of the amended complaint it appears that under date of December 9, 1927, a writing in the Italian language passed between the parties, a true translation of which, according to the plaintiff, is in manner and form as follows:
“ Paolo Magrini
“ New York
“ 55 W. 92 St.
“ In continuation of the understanding between us that regards the invention of the machine ‘ Aerelectron ’ that you wish to sell in the U. S. A., I the undersigned formally bind myself to:
'• (1) To help you in making the arrangements for the application for the patent in the U. S. A.— that is to say to present you…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Oscar Schlegel Manufacturing Co. v. Peter Cooper's Glue FactoryNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Rubin v. SiegelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
3Cited by10 opinions
- Padbloc Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Red Robin Stores, Inc. v. RoseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- Halpern v. SilverCity of New York Municipal Court · 1946
- Schusterman v. C & F Caterers, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1948
- Malco Trading Corp. v. Mendelson-Silverman, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.