Legal Opinion

Prevatte v. Prevatte

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 16, 1953PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This was a suit for divorce a mensa. From order denying motion for alimony pendente Ute the plaintiff gave notice of appeal and attempted to appeal in forma pauperis. However, it appears *121that there was no order allowing appeal in forma, pauperis after the filing of affidavit of poverty subsequent to the term. GLS. 1-288. True, the judge wrote in the judgment “plaintiff allowed to appeal in forma pau-peris upon compliance with the statute,” but this would not authorize disregard of the provisions of the statute. Anderson v. Worthington, 238 N.C. 577. The requirements of the statute allowing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brown Ex Rel. Brown v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  2. Williams v. . TillmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. Anderson v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re ShieldsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API