Prevatte v. Prevatte
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Per curiam
This was a suit for divorce a mensa. From order denying motion for alimony pendente Ute the plaintiff gave notice of appeal and attempted to appeal in forma pauperis. However, it appears *121that there was no order allowing appeal in forma, pauperis after the filing of affidavit of poverty subsequent to the term. GLS. 1-288. True, the judge wrote in the judgment “plaintiff allowed to appeal in forma pau-peris upon compliance with the statute,” but this would not authorize disregard of the provisions of the statute. Anderson v. Worthington, 238 N.C. 577. The requirements of the statute allowing…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Brown Ex Rel. Brown v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- Williams v. . TillmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Anderson v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re ShieldsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984