Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Caufield-Ori

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 7, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Casey, J. Appeals from two decisions of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 17, 1995, which ruled that claimant and others similarly situated were employees of Abbott Blumberg.

Abbott Blumberg operates a business in which he refers models to companies in the garment industry. After claimant, a model, applied for unemployment insurance benefits and hearings were held before an Administrative Law Judge, the Board found that claimant and other models represented by Blumberg were Blumberg’s employees and not independent contractors. Blumberg challenges this finding arguing, inter…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re Concourse Ophthalmology Associates, P. C.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. In re Nurse Care Registry, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. In re FMI Interpreting ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. In re Claim of ChopikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  5. In re SlovinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of BraunsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Matter of Waggoneer (Commr. of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API